From The New American.com
| Written by Bob Adelmann | |
| Thursday, 08 December 2011 17:14 | |
       | In his candid appraisal of  the letter from Germany’s Angela Merkel and France’s Nicolas Sarkozy to  the European Union meeting that starts Friday in Brussels, Dan Murphy  makes clear that this summit will be different from the previous 20:  This one is determined to override national sovereignty to save the  euro. The core of the letter is the offer of the fatal alternative to  the euro zone nations: Either give up essential sovereign control over  your budgets to the EU, or destroy the euro. The “Merkozy” letter said,   The current crisis has uncovered the deficiencies in the construction  of the [European Monetary Union] mercilessly. We need to remedy those  deficiencies…. We need more binding and more ambitious rules and  commitments for the Euro area Member States. They should reflect that  sharing a single currency means sharing responsibility for the Euro area  as a whole. The building blocks of the new Stability and Growth Union  are: A strengthened institutional architecture. Euro area governance  needs to be substantially reinforced. The problem, until now, has been the virtual impossibility of amending  unanimously the various treaties under which the EU currently operates.  With the clock ticking amid increasingly nervous financial markets,  there is no time for that nicety. And so a way has been found: doing an  end run around the process by using a little-known clause in the Schengen treaty to speed up implementation of the “strengthened institutional architecture” that is needed.In a speech on Thursday in Marseille, Sarkozy expanded on just what the new agreement would require, along with guarded references to how it might be enforced. He said, “Never has [a united] Europe been so necessary. Never has it been in so much danger…. Never has the risk of a disintegration of Europe been so great. Europe is facing an extraordinarily dangerous situation.” What is needed, he said, is the ability to enforce budgetary discipline by penalizing those countries that overspend under the new rules. In their joint letter, Merkel and Sarkozy’s proposed plan would 
 Van Rompuy’s “fiscal compact” would strip away voting rights from EU members who are out of compliance, enforced by the executive arm of the EU. Sarkozy was opaque on whether such “enforcements” would involve military action or invasion of the offending countries, or just the forced removal of the recalcitrant elected officials who were dragging their heels on various austerity measures to be imposed to bring them back into compliance. But it is clear that the rhetoric in Brussels is being ramped up as the financial uncertainties in the markets escalate. As Samuel Gregg, writing in the Acton Commentary noted,   The euro was always essentially about the use of an economic tool to  realize a political grand design: European unification. Major backers of  the common currency back in the 1990s, such as Jacques Delors and  Helmut Kohl, never hid the fact that this was their ultimate ambition….  [It now appears that] much of Europe’s political class seems willing to  go to almost any lengths to save the euro — including … [going] beyond  the bounds permitted by EU treaty law and national constitutions. As Murphy noted, “The call for bracing, immediate change should lead to  a fascinating day [as] European leaders gather in Brussels.” | 

No comments:
Post a Comment
Anyone have any thoughts about this?