Monday, December 13, 2010


Revelation 17

If the Roman Catholic Church is indeed the "Mother of Harlots", it behooves us to know whom these daughters may be! (Click on the title of this post for a more detailed proof that the Roman Catholic Church IS Mystery Babylon the Mother of Harlots.)

The apostles doctrine of the 1st century given by the scriptural apostles, shows that everyone in the New Testament church was baptized in the name of the lord Jesus.

Acts 2:
38. Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
41. Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls.
42. And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.

Acts 8:
14. Now when the apostles which were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent unto them Peter and John:
15. Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Ghost:
16. (For as yet he was fallen upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.)

Acts 10:
47. Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
48. And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.

Acts 19:
4. Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.
5. When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.

Every letter, or epistle written after "Acts" was written to those already saved (see the power point-"the Roman Road to Salvation". When did the dogma of baptizing using the phasing of Matt.28: 19. "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:" come into force?
Obviously the true apostles understood the one name encompassing "Father, Son and Holy Ghost" was Jesus, as evidenced by the sited scripture.

Col. 2:
8. Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
9. For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

The doctrine of the trinity was made dogma for the "church" after 325 AD, the Council of Nicea. After Roman Emperor Constantine (a pagan) stopped the persecution of Christianity, then made his style of "Christianity" the state religion...biblical Christianity started to disappear, being replaced by the new brand- Roman Christianity. Adherence to this and coming new doctrines was enforced by punishing the "heretic" (anyone not agreeing with the new stuff)by even death.

Baptism in the trinity formula is absolutely of Roman Catholic origination. Protestantism changed many things, but unfortunately NOT the mode (sprinkling babies- even though babies can't believe, nor repent)and formula of baptism (trinity).

“Justin Martys was one of the early Fathers of the Roman Catholic Church who helped change the ancient baptism of “in the Name of Jesus Christ” to the titles of Father, Son and Holy Ghost”

FORMULA “With regard to the form used for baptism in the early Church, there is the difficulty that although Matthew 28:19 speaks of the Trinitarian formula which is now used, the Acts of the Apostles (2:38, 8:16, 10:48, 19:5) and Paul (I Corinthians 1:13, 6:11, Galatians 3:27, Romans 6:3) speak only of baptism “in the Name of Jesus.”

 CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA, 1967 edition, volume 2, pages 56, 59.
“An explicit reference to the Trinitarian formula of baptism cannot be found in the first centuries.”

 CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEIA, 1913 edition, volume 2, Page 265:
“They acknowledge that the original formula for baptism was in the Name of Jesus, but
the pope changed it.”

If YOUR church does NOT baptize in Jesus name, you are most likely unwittingly a member of one of the daughter harlot churches. Demand to be re-baptized in the name of Jesus as a believer..if you have decided to follow Jesus and his WORD for the rest of your life. You must be immersed...

12. Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead.
13. And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses;
14. Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;

2 Cor.6:
17a. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord,...

A Harlot is a woman who functions as a wife without the privilege of a husbands name.
We obtain that name when we "put on Christ".
Gal.3: 27. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.

Jesus name baptism by immersion is the ONLY scripturally approved baptism. If your church doesn't practice this, GET OUT of that church! Your eternal destiny rides on this point! I believe you have hooked up with a harlot daughter of the Roman Catholic Church. This isn't a joke. Prayerfully seek Jesus and his word on this point. If you can find one example after the day of Pentecost where anyone was baptized using the trinity formula, forget this post! But, if you can't find any example of the baptism YOU were baptized with (there aren't any) you better make sure of your own salvation.

12. Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.

What About Matthew 28:19?
Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: 20:  Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.

What is the name of the Father, and the Son and the Holy Ghost?  Apparently the apostles believed it to be Jesus!

For the power-point presentation on Baptism, Water & Spirit, go here.


  1. The first recorded baptismal change from the usual apostolic formula of into Jesus name in some form was by Justin Martyr, a Greek Catholic. He used a trinity type but with the name of Jesus at it's center still in 145 AD. Embolden by Justin, Catholic Tertullian creates a trinity in Godhead and baptism. He derives it from Plato's work of Timaeus, but twists it's true meaning to invent the tri-unity. It took another 125 years for the catholics to adopt this Babylonian and pagan based doctrine, under a corrupt Roman emperor. Today many accept a Cloned God without any power. Peace.

  2. Thanks, I went to your site, nice work. You need to post more often! Your contribution is too strong to be so sporadic! Anyone reading this, go to Acts2and38 to read his excellent posts! Fred

  3. Acts2and38 posts frequently at his other site:

    Go see his site, and tell him Fred sent ya!

  4. When Israel fell into idolatry, the Bible referred to them as a harlot. Hosea was told to marry a harlot to represent such an occurrence. This idea carries with it the idea of a compromised wife, not just simply a woman of ill repute. Since the RCC does not obey the Acts 2:38 salvation or teach the godhead as being One God, how can they be a harlot to a God to whom they were never espoused?


Anyone have any thoughts about this?


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...