|
By Doug Hagmann (Bio
and Archives) Monday, August 26, 2013
Comments | Print friendly | Subscribe | Email Us |
“Pay attention! You are seeing the
opening acts to a global war, to World War III. Refer to the information I gave
you right after the attacks in Benghazi, specifically to the information
contained in‘Lemmings…at the
precipice of WW III’ and you will see that everything I divulged to
you was precisely correct.
World War III will begin in Syria,
and no one on the planet (and Americans in particular) will be left untouched
by what is about to take place. This has been planned for some time, and we are
now seeing it happen right in front of us.” Those are the words of a trusted
source with deep ties to the intelligence community, before providing more
insight into what we might expect as this ‘crisis’ escalates and “Syria explodes.”
As I wrote in that article published
on October 8, 2012, “All that is needed now is for a dutiful media to present
one image, a video, or some other proof that Assad or someone else is using, or
has their hands on, unconventional weapons. This will provide the necessary
pretext for the U.S. and NATO, to intervene and ramp up the war against Assad.
The UN will assist, and the red line will then have been crossed.” That will be
the trigger event for U.S. involvement, and the escalation into a global
conflict.
We are now at that critical moment,
as the images of the use of chemical weapons are all over the news, and all
fingers are pointing to Assad as the culprit. Just as predicted, The Guardian
among other media outlets reported
that “David Cameron and Barack Obama moved the West closer to military
intervention in Syria on Saturday as they agreed that last week’s alleged
chemical weapon attacks by the Assad regime had taken the crisis into a new
phase that merited a ‘serious response.’” But it’s a lie, a magic show, to keep
people’s attention away from something much bigger on the horizon.
Syria through the lens of the Arab Spring & Benghazi
“The entire scenario we are seeing
is one big magic act that began long ago, and Syria is just the ‘flash-bang’
diversion of the act, albeit a vital one. To understand how we got here is
critically important, as it identifies the larger agenda or the big picture too
few are seeing and too many are attempting to hide.
Consider the blatant continuity of
agenda that has spanned several American presidential administrations, both
Republican and Democrat, Progressive and Conservative. This transcends
political parties and the ‘political theater’ that has been designed to keep
Americans occupied. Both political parties, however, are unified under a much
larger globalist agenda, which explains why the policies of the Bush ‘dynasty’
have been exponentially increased under the Obama ‘regime.’
“Think about it. The anti-Assad
‘rebels’ are losing, they’re in retreat, because the exposure to the arms and
weapons running from Benghazi caused the architects of this conflict to lay low
for awhile. That gave us some time, but it did not change their objective of
overthrowing Assad and taking Syria for the Muslim Brotherhood. The anti-Assad
rebels cannot survive without Western assistance. Considering that, what sense
would it make for Assad to use chemical weapons, especially as international
observers were getting in position to investigate the situation, against rebels
in retreat? It makes no sense, unless you understand the larger
objective and the ‘big picture.’”
“Okay, so explain the big picture,”
I asked my source. “And please do it in a way that I can explain it to my
neighbor, or my family, so they too can understand what we’re seeing.” What
follows is an uninterrupted monologue from my intelligence insider.
The big picture explained
“Here’s the global picture. When you
see it, it will make sense. This is about reshaping the entire power structure
of not just the Middle East, but of the world.”
“Remember that the 2001 attacks
against the U.S. was the catalyst for our military operations in Afghanistan,
and then ostensibly Iraq under George W. Bush, a so-called ‘conservative
republican.’ We could have gone into Afghanistan, cleaned up what we needed to,
and come home. Instead, while still in Afghanistan, we went into Iraq after
convincing the world they had weapons of mass destruction. Remember that George
H. W. Bush, also a ‘conservative republican,’ engaged Iraq in ‘Gulf War I’ in
1990. Essentially, we’ve been in Iraq for the last quarter of a century!
Why? Think about that.”
“And, we’ve been in Afghanistan for
the last dozen years or so. Why? Oil and opium. It’s an ‘international bankers
war.’ [Note that a recent report from ‘The Guerrilla Economist lays this out here,
excerpted as follows]: “...[L]arge US military bases are on the very path of
the purposed [Caspian Sea oil] pipeline. This as well as that some of the
proceeds from the lucrative opium trade will find its way back to US banks
which will launder the money in order to help fund Unocal in the purposed pipe
building project. Win Win.”
“Oh, and by the way, if you mention
Iran’s nuclear ambitions, why did we wait so long to really address this and
keep Israel from doing so before any action would require a very protracted
military campaign? Keep that in the back of your mind.”
“Now here’s another important part
of the magic act. After eight years of George Bush, Americans were weary of
war. So, a little known man named Barack Hussein Obama was selected to run
against John McCain in 2008. Why Obama and not Hillary? Because the real power players
needed a man with Muslim Brotherhood connections to accomplish what was needed
in the Middle East. Think back to his Cairo speech. Consider that all of his
campaign promises to end the wars were not only broken, but the wars and unrest
were expanded by his policies, or the policies of those who put him into
power.”
“So we’ve stayed in Afghanistan and
in Iraq.” Then comes the Arab Spring, which was planned years in advance. It
was not some serendipitously spontaneous movement by oppressed people longing
for democracy, but a Saudi and Muslim Brotherhood plan to regain control of
what was once the Ottoman Empire, this time on steroids. People must think
bigger, outside of the confines of the Middle East.”
“As much as I don’t like the thought
of saying this, Putin was correct in asking what sense it makes to destabilize
the entire Middle East, especially Syria, a client state of Russia. In the
context of regional affairs, it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Now, we
are going to send cruise missiles into Syria… to hit what? Chemical weapons
stockpiles stored in densely populated areas? How is this going to help the
Syrians? The refugees fleeing from Syria?”
“I’ve told you, and you have written
that we are implementing the Saudi agenda across the Middle East. But who is
behind the Saudis? It is the international banking cartel, those ‘too big to
jail,’ who are behind the Saudis. It’s their war and they’re funding all sides
of the conflict. No matter what, they win. But what do they win?”
“Admittedly it’s difficult if not
nearly impossible to tell all the players without a scorecard, and even then,
the players will change their uniforms to keep everyone confused. But here’s
the important part. Syria is a proxy state for Russia, as is Iran. China has
interests in Iran as well. If you look at all of the major powers, they all
have interests in the Middle East. So who will we, the U.S. ultimately be
fighting when Syria explodes? Russia. And what will be the blowback? That’s
important to understand, for it is also the objective.”
Blowback
“None of what you are seeing is
about fighting terrorism, or about helping the people of Syria. It’s about oil,
energy and the global economic system. Conflict exists for the globalists to
achieve their objective, and their objective is the implementation of a new
economic system that will be a basket of currencies, or SDR (Special Drawing
Rights). If you don’t know about SDRs, just equate it to the euro, but on a
global scale.”
They will usher this in by striking
at the United States much like the U.S. took down the old Soviet Union. They
will target our economy through oil, cheap oil, from Saudi Arabia. Remember,
Russia is the world’s largest exporter of oil, neck and neck with the Saudis.
But, the Saudis’ oil wells have been damaged and their ‘lift costs’ are
increasing.”
“So, what we are about to see and
experience in a most painful way is the destruction of the U.S. economy, the
intentional killing of the U.S. dollar, by having it replaced as the world’s
reserve currency, and replaced with a basket of currencies (SDR) that is much
easier to control.”
“This is all about the conversion of
world’s economic trading mechanism from a U.S. dollar based system to a SDR.
The Middle East and Syria is merely the catalyst for is implementation. The
‘flash-bang’ of the magic act. And once this catalytic action is started, we
cannot go back. War in the Middle East and particularly Syria is the catalyst
that will disrupt transactions and commerce all over the world. And few will
see it coming, or know what hit them.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Anyone have any thoughts about this?