Rev.1: 8. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.---Jesus is the Alpha and Omega- the Almighty!
Daniel 11:33. And they that understand among the people shall instruct many: yet they shall fall by the sword, and by flame, by captivity, and by spoil, many days.
Ron Paul on the Evil Fed, the IRS, and Saving the Buck
Hoping to restore a little conservatism in the mindset of true Americans.
Found at Businessweek.com posted on Nov.29,
By Maria Bartiromo At 72, Ron Paul is a Web phenomenon. His campaign says that
some 80% of the $17 million raised in the past four quarters—including about
$4.3 million in one October day—has come from online supporters. And according
to a mid-November poll, the Republican Presidential hopeful is gaining ground in
New Hampshire, though he's still in single digits. Like maverick candidates such
as Howard Dean in 2004 and Ross Perot in 1992, Paul seems to connect with voters
hungry for unvarnished positions. Paul, an obstetrician and 10-term congressman
from the Texas Gulf Coast, voted against the war in Iraq and wants the troops
home fast, but it's his economic ideas that are the most radical: He detests the
Fed and would abolish the IRS. Paul was about to climb on a plane for a campaign
trip to South Carolina when I caught up with him.
MARIA BARTIROMO Q:
As President, how would you strengthen the economy?
RON PAUL A: The
most important thing is to get control of the budget, because the more we spend
and the higher the deficit, the more we have to tax and borrow and inflate the
currency—literally create new credit to buy Treasury bills. We need to restore
confidence in the dollar before [its decline] gets out of control. The easiest
place to cut spending is overseas because it's doing so much harm to us,
undermining our national defense and ruining our budget. I would start saving
hundreds of billions of dollars by giving up on defending the American empire.
I'd start bringing our troops home, not only from the Middle East but from
Korea, Japan, and Europe, and save enough money to slash the deficit. We can
actually pay down the national debt and still take care of people here at home.
That would restore a lot of confidence.
Q: What is the most important
change you would make?
A: Aim for the federal government to immediately
live within its means, to take the pressure off the Fed to create
Q: And that means what? Means no more inflation. If the Fed
doesn't create money out of thin air—and they do it mostly to accommodate the
deficits—that would restore the soundness of the dollar and give us our
purchasing power back.
Q: But as President, you're supposed to be
independent from the Fed. You would encourage the Fed to stop printing
A: You know this idea that we can create a secret bank and they
manage things and rarely tell us—or Congress or the Executive Branch—what
they're really doing, there's a problem there. I can't even go to a monetary
policy board meeting of the Federal Reserve, and I'm on the Banking Committee of
the U.S. Congress. I want open government, and certainly the Fed ought to be
open. But it's an institution that really shouldn't exist. [Its financing]
allows Big Government to get bigger without being responsible. And that's why we
have runaway spending for both warfare and welfare.
Q: Hasn't the Fed
been effective in providing liquidity in the current credit crisis?
You're right, but it's sort of like a drug addict. The drug addict demands more
or he's going to have convulsions. The economy would have a convulsion if the
Fed didn't inject more credit. But if you continue to do that, the problem gets
worse. You can't solve the problem of monetary inflation with monetary
inflation. These circumstances have all been created by our government and the
Q: How was the recent crisis caused by our government?
was astounding that you could get a mortgage at 4%, and this was all due to the
Fed creating money and artificially lowering rates, which gets people to do the
wrong thing. Builders do the wrong thing, and people borrow money and buy houses
they can't afford.
Q: How would you change tax policy?
get rid of the income tax. In the meantime, I'd give huge tax credits to anybody
who wanted to take care of their own medical care. I'd give tax credits for all
educational benefits. I'd get the government out of managing education and
medicine. And do it by changing the tax code. I have a bill right now that is
very popular, especially for people who are trying to work their way through
college or who are having a tough time making ends meet, and that is to exempt
all taxes on tips. People who have a first job or a second job waiting on tables
and doing other things, they're harassed by government rules and regulations,
and sometimes they have to pay higher taxes than the tips they actually receive.
I'd move next to saying no taxes on anybody who's trying to get through college.
Why do we tax them, make it hard for them, then give them grants? It doesn't
make any sense.
Q: Who are your economic advisers?
A: I don't have
any. I read Austrian economics, which I've been doing for 30 years. So my
advisers have been [von] Mises and Hayek and Sennholz.
Q: Do you consider
yourself a friend or a foe of Wall Street?
A: If they believe in freedom,
free markets, and sound money, they'll love me. But if they like creating credit
out of thin air, they'll see me as a threat. I was one of three people who voted
against Sarbanes-Oxley because I thought it was detrimental to Wall Street. I'd
Q: You want to take the troops out of Iraq, but what about
Iran? What do we do if other nations turn hostile?
A: I'd treat them
something like what we did with the Soviets. I was called to military duty [as a
U.S. Air Force flight surgeon] in the '60s when they were in Cuba, and they had
40,000 nuclear weapons and intercontinental ballistic missiles, and we didn't
have to fight them. We didn't have to invade their country. But to deal with
terrorism, we can't solve the problem if we don't understand why they [attack
us]. And they don't come because we're free and prosperous. They don't go after
Switzerland and Sweden and Canada. They come after us because we've occupied
their land, and instead of reversing our foreign policy after 9/11, we made it
worse by invading two more countries and then threatening a third. Why wouldn't
they be angry at us? It would be absolutely bizarre if they weren't. We've been
meddling over there for more than 50 years. We overthrew a democratically
elected government in Iran in 1953; we were Saddam Hussein's ally and encouraged
him to invade Iran. If I was an Iranian, I'd be annoyed myself, you know. So we
need to change our policy, and I think we would reduce the danger.
have vehement new supporters. What's driving the sudden interest in your
A: I think they're sick and tired of what they're getting.
They've lost all trust and faith in the government. They believe in the American
Dream, and they're getting a nightmare. And they're rallying behind the program
I've been working on for 30 years—defending the Constitution, limited
government, free markets, sound money, and self-reliance; believing people can
take care of themselves better than government can. The nanny state doesn't
work, the police state doesn't work, and neither does the warfare. And they know
Maria Bartiromo is the anchor of CNBC's Closing Bell.