|
By Doug Hagmann (Bio
and Archives) Tuesday, September 24, 2013
Comments | Print friendly | Subscribe | Email Us |
Consider the common public characterizations of the prpetrators
of the last several mass shootings in the U.S., such as James Holmes (the
Aurora, Colorado movie theater shooting), Adam Lanza (Sandy Hook
Elementary School) and most recently, Aaron Alexis, the named shooter at
the Naval Sea Systems Command inside the Washington Navy Yard in Southeast
Washington, D.C. Even the most skeptical among us would have to agree
that there is not only something eerily similar about the characterizations
made public of each alleged perpetrator, but there is something not quite right
with the changes made to the official narratives in “real time” as well as
after the fact.
|
Perhaps the circumstances of Aaron
Alexis are the most blatant as well as the most current. The man who brought
wholesale death to a quiet morning at a secure military location has been
characterized as mentally ill, with the media noting that he was plagued by
voices in his head.
More than a month before the
shooting, on August 7, 2013, Alexis reported to police that he was being
stalked by unidentified individuals who followed him to three different motels,
and these individuals were using some sort of “microwave machine” to send
voices into his body and keeping him awake at night. It is interesting and
potentially relevant that Alexis refused to tell police what the voices were
instructing him to do. [A copy of the redacted police report can be downloaded
in PDF format here].
At this point, I suspect that the majority of the “sane” among us would simply
write Alexis off as mentally ill and unworthy of any further intellectual
discourse. But could there be something more to this story?
While the media has been
consistently reporting that Alexis had a long history of mental illness, those
who knew Alexis long before and up to the shooting defended his mental
stability. Although he reportedly had several previous altercations with the
law, it is rather curious that Alexis was not criminally charged in at least
two of the more severe of those occasions. A review of his criminal records
history might suggest that something else was going on, especially considering
his self-described “blackouts” during those events.
|
Despite his reported checkered
history and claims of recent public questions regarding his mental stability,
Alexis was granted security clearance as a government subcontractor, working
for a company called “The Experts,” which is a subsidiary of HP Enterprise
Services owned by Hewlett Packard. Notably, congressional oversight is now
asserting that there were faults with the company performing the background
checks for government workers and subcontractors. Nonetheless, is it
reasonable, although certainly unpopular, to ask whether incompetence alone is
responsible for Alexis being granted the security clearance.
It is unpopular if not unacceptable
in “normal” social circles to discuss other possibilities or facilitating
factors associated with not only the homicidal actions of Aaron Alexis, but of
others including James Holmes, Adam Lanza and others. Such discussion will
result in one labeled as residing in the lunatic fringe of society, with
accusers quick to shut down any intellectual discourse of the topic.
An example of this appears in a
September 20, 2013 article in Wired Magazine by author Allen McDuffee, titled Conspiracy Theories
Abound After Navy Yard Shooting. While the title seems to tell it
all, it is interesting that the author nearly makes the case in favor of a
“mind control” conspiracy regarding the most recent shooting. Excerpted from
the article:
“The microwave weaponry theory would
be just as absurd as some of the other conspiracies if the Pentagon hadn’t been
researching the possibility of using similar voice-projection technology in the
past as a nonlethal weapon.”
“According to one report on the
project, such a weapon would create a condition similar to schizophrenia.
‘Application of the microwave hearing technology could facilitate a private
message transmission. It may be useful to provide a disruptive condition to a
person not aware of the technology. Not only might it be disruptive to the
sense of hearing, it could be psychologically devastating if one suddenly heard
‘voices within one’s head.’”
Behind the looking glass
Just a few short years ago, I too
would have scoffed at the mere mention that these mass shooting events were
anything but tragedies at the hands of sick and mentally-ill psychopaths.
Granted, there are some sick and twisted people out there who need no help to
kill others. But looking at these events collectively, a pattern seems to be
emerging beyond the confines of the individual events themselves.
If we confine our investigation to
the most recent shooting alone, it is unlikely that we are seeing all of the
facts pertinent to the numerous shootings over the last few years - even the
last several decades. If we look back into history, even as far back as the
shooting death of Robert F. Kennedy, might we be seeing something more to the
story of these random shooting events? Is it possible that there are agendas at
play, and programs at work behind the scenes to which we are not privy?
Is it possible for rogue, criminal
elements inside of the U.S. government to target the minds of certain
individuals through electronic means to engage in certain behavior, including
killing others? Before dismissing this possibility as some conspiracy theory
unworthy of further consideration, please do some research, starting with the
1975 findings of the Church Committee. The disclosures from this investigation
alone confirmed that our government was engaged in mind control experiments,
spending billions of dollars and using unwitting subjects on which to test
their latest drugs and electronic weaponry.
This CIA activity was further
verified in the August 6, 2010 publication of Time Magazine, not exactly
considered to be a fringe publication. A list of “Top Ten Weird
Government Secrets” was published with number two on that list being
“mind control.”
Within that article, it is stated
that “some historians argue that the goal of the
program was to create a mind-control system by which the CIA could program
people to conduct assassinations.” Is it possible that we’ve been
seeing this being played out in different venues, for different reasons? For
today’s purposes, for gun control, perhaps? To condition the population to
accept tighter “security” measures?
Before dismissing this as nonsense,
consider the highly credentialed and well-researched Dr. John Hall, MD, who
authored the book A New Breed: Satellite Terrorism in America. Just
five-(5) days before the mass shooting event at the Washington Navy Yard, Dr.
Hall appeared as a guest on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, speaking about
his documentation of stalking and mind control. Interestingly, Aaron Alexis
complained of being stalked, or harassed and having voices thrust into his head
prior to his shooting spree last week. Listening to the broadcast could have
been a template for what we observed not only at the Naval Yard, but at
previous historical shooting events.
In addition to the mind control
aspect of this and other such events, is it not reasonable to consider and even
question the many inconsistencies in nearly all of the official narratives of
the incident reports, from the shooting of Robert Kennedy to the latest
shooting at the Navy Yard? Is it responsible for us to simply dismiss these
documented inconsistencies in light of what we know about CIA mind control
experimentation? I would argue that failing to address such issues is not only
irresponsible, but possibly being complicit in these events.
We are living in strange times where
it would irresponsible of us not to ask questions, demand answers and
accountability, despite the risks of being described as a conspiracy theorist.
Based on factual evidence presented before congress nearly 40 years ago, CIA
mind control is not a conspiracy. What would make you believe their actions
have stopped following the disclosure by the Church Committee?
Related: Listen to the interview
with Dr. John Hall here (advance
to the second hour)
Copyright © Douglas J. Hagmann and
Canada Free Press
Douglas J. Hagmann and his son, Joe
Hagmann host The Hagmann &
Hagmann Report, a live Internet radio program broadcast each
weeknight from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET.
Douglas Hagmann, founder &
director of the Northeast
Intelligence Network, and a multi-state licensed private
investigative agency. Doug began using his investigative skills and training to
fight terrorism and increase public awareness through his website.
Doug can be reached at: director@homelandsecurityus.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Anyone have any thoughts about this?